Day giggers vs. ‘real’ musicians: the false dichotomy


Sriram Gopal
Swing District


I very clearly remember the moment – it happened during my sophomore year of college – when I decided not to pursue music as a full-time career. I was a biochemistry major at the University of Maryland, but spent most of my spare time rehearsing with bands or in the practice rooms. One afternoon, after a jam session with some friends, I spent the rest of the day contemplating changing my major to music. By the time I went to bed that night, my decision was made, and I never revisited my choice: to have a more traditional 9-to-5 lifestyle while feeding my music habit during evenings and weekends.

I don’t regret that decision. But one can’t help contemplating the road not traveled, which has led me to thinking about the role of part-time musicians within the jazz community (to clarify: I consider musicians who teach during the day to be full-time, working players). The District has a rich artistic history, especially with respect to jazz, but so many of the musicians here are day giggers like me. To explore the issue further, I approached two friends who both are also in their 30s, and for whom I have the utmost respect as musicians. They come from similar backgrounds, having received a formal music education in college, but their professional lives differ greatly. In my interviews with them, I hoped to compare their experiences with mine while drawing out some broader themes about this intensely personal choice.

Joe Herrera. Courtesy Timothy Forbes Photography

Joe Herrera is the archetypal working musician, wearing many hats – including those of trumpeter, producer and bandleader. The Arizona native has been in D.C. just shy of 10 years, and can be seen co-directing the Bohemian Caverns Jazz Orchestra, playing with the Funk Ark and as a sideman with a number of his colleagues. Bassist Matt Grason chose a very different path. After receiving a graduate degree from the Manhattan School of Music, he returned to the area and began gigging around town while building up a roster of students. After having music as his primary profession for 15 years, Grason decided to get a day job in the non-profit world. These days, his main musical venture is his band, House of Soul, which specializes in jazz-infused house music that replaces the standard DJ with a live band.

The major issue that both gentlemen brought up was financial. Whether it’s Bach or Mozart composing for the church, a record company giving a young rock band an advance, or an artist accumulating a large and supportive enough audience, musicians must find the money for rent somewhere. Herrera, who says he is now considering getting a day job, depends on his gigs to earn money. But with the success of groups like the Funk Ark, he often must turn down weekend “society” gigs that pay well in order to hit the road with the band.

“Unfortunately, it seems the more you try to do the right thing musically, your wallet feels the effect,” he said.

Thanks to earnings from his 9-to-5, Grason serves as his own patron. “I can give local musicians gigs and pay five musicians out of my pocket when the venue only pays enough to hire two,” he said.

In Grason’s case, his varied interests drove much of his decision to leave the grind of being a full-time artist. He wanted to spend time with friends whose schedules rarely coincided with that of a working musician. He also felt a need to have a profession that gave him a “sense of contributing to the greater good.” Most importantly, Grason wanted the range of choices, both personal and musical, that came with financial independence.

Matt Grason. Courtesy Matt Grason

“Music went from being my master to being an inspiring hobby again, like when I first started playing as a teenager,” he explained.

But does the decision to take a day job affect one’s musical abilities? After all, people like Herrera have the flexibility to hone their craft in a way that a person with a day job does not. Instead of spending all day in an office, sitting at a computer, he can devote time to practicing, writing and booking new opportunities. In my case, over ten years have passed since I’ve had a daily practice routine and I’m lucky to have more than a few hours of dedicated practice in a given week. But my technical limitations gave rise unexpectedly to a different kind of creativity, forcing me to do more with less while giving a new focus to the practice time that was available. While Herrera sees a lot of value to spending time in the woodshed, he draws no distinctions when it comes to sharing the stage with full-time or part-time musicians.

“I know D.C. is very much a ‘what do you do’ town. I don’t think that translates to the stage,” he said. “The proof is in the pudding.”

Whether a musician decides to pursue that passion full-time or not, there is something noble in either decision, because each requires its own set of sacrifices. In the end, however, listeners don’t care how performers earn their living, so long as they create an engaging experience that is worth the price of admission. When day giggers like me are on stage, we are professionals. We must strive to blur the distinction with dedicated musicians like Herrera. The ultimate goal is always the same: to create quality music with integrity, while leaving behind what Grason called “a creative legacy.”

Sriram Gopal is CapitalBop’s monthly columnist. He can be reached at [email protected].



About Sriram Gopal

view all posts

A proud son of Maryland who now calls the District home, Sriram has been active on the local music scene since the mid-1990s, both as a musician and writer. As a drummer, he has performed at Blues Alley, Bohemian Caverns, the Kennedy Center, Strathmore and many other area venues and festivals. He has covered the local jazz scene for DCist since 2007, and has since written for the Washington Examiner, Modern Drummer and Washingtonian. You can reach Sriram at [email protected].

You May Like This

  1. here’s the real deal:
    as a jazzz drummer, sometimes i can have the luxury to see what’s very obvious without being worried about notes and what substitutions your using that may or may not even matter, even to an ear like mine. and no, i’m not the jenious who can teach anyone a song with perfect teaching methods in ten seconds or less.
    but i do have a very good ear for a lot of things like, feel, time, and form.
    more to the point, i’d say that,
    day gig or not – the difference is often in the mentality that someone brings to it
    in other words, how many tunes do you know andd how well do you know them
    do you read well, or is reading like your master that you can’t make the most basic move without.
    can you play with a ddecent variety of cats, or do you act like a record, unable to adapt to someone who’s less accomplished than you.
    is it all about you, and when you are guilty of that, do you even know that you are, or did you even know what i meant by this last one.
    oll stop now but, i think that if my point is to be made, that it has been by now
    Good Morning to all then

    Ian Dylan /
  2. Really interesting article!

    gene /
  3. Really good piece and one that should be an ongoing conversation…thanks!

    Chad Carter /
  4. […] “Full-time” vs. “part-time” musicians, by a “part-time” musician and jazz author here in Washington, D.C. Here’s an engaging demeanour during how musicians put together a pieces. […]

  5. Not mentioned is the middle road. Full time musicians with part time jobs.
    That’s what I did and I love it. Gigs, practice time and a little base money to relax you. Without having to teach music or othe music oriented day jobs.
    Lots of mucians fall outside the dichotomy presented in this article.

    James /
  6. […] “Full-time” vs. “part-time” musicians, by a “part-time” musician and jazz writer here in Washington, D.C. Here’s an interesting look at how musicians put together the pieces. […]

Comments are closed.